P5: Record an extract of the planned radio programme.
|
Finished exported radio show
|
5 Minute extract
Screenshots of the editing process:
Below you can see screenshots of my edit. You can see along the side I have labelled each piece of audio, so I know which piece I'm editing, as well as me using the scissor tool to split the audio into sections. ( I edited this on Audacity )
Shots of the recording process:
Below you can see the microphone I used to record the interviews, as well as the microphone I used to record the bulk of the radio show. You can also see me recording in the sound gallery.
D2: Evaluate the flow of the programme content and audio levels
How successful was the running order (or flow) of your planned new radio programme?
I think the flow of my piece was successful it didn't feel rushed or too slow, for example towards the end of the piece I do an outro explains
I think that the running order was successful, mainly because it gave me an idea on what to do and on what time I should do a task during recording my radio documentary. It helped me become more organise and have an idea on what I should do on the day of the recording. Some parts of the radio documentary flowed really well, an example would be near the end of the documentary, when one music track ended then having a sting before then transitioning into a different music track. That section flowed really well together because it wasn't very ;choppy' it didn't seem as there was any sections. However, some parts of the radio documentary didn't really flow well together, an example would be in the middle of the documentary when a music track transitioned into one another, because both music tracks had different beats and were very different it was difficult to transition. To improve that I think I should've used music that were very similar to one another or just used a sting to transition before songs together. If I compared the flow of my radio documentary to one in Radio 4, I don't think it sounds as professional as Radio 4's, this is because when I was listening to the Blondie documentary on Radio 4 the whole documentary had really good flow, there wasn't any point in the documentary where it didn't flow well. Comparing it to mine, the flow wasn't really consistent; in some parts in flowed well and in others it didn't.
Was all the content included relevant and did all of it work well? Discuss this point and give evidence from the finished recording.
What do you feel were your key strengths during the making of this production from blank paper to finished piece, comment on every aspect and say what were your strengths.
What do you feel were your key weaknesses during the making of this production from blank paper to finished piece, comment on every aspect and say what were your weaknesses.
How do you feel you performed during this project?
Looking back on your short production what would you revise or adjust to make the programme
I think the flow of my piece was successful it didn't feel rushed or too slow, for example towards the end of the piece I do an outro explains
I think that the running order was successful, mainly because it gave me an idea on what to do and on what time I should do a task during recording my radio documentary. It helped me become more organise and have an idea on what I should do on the day of the recording. Some parts of the radio documentary flowed really well, an example would be near the end of the documentary, when one music track ended then having a sting before then transitioning into a different music track. That section flowed really well together because it wasn't very ;choppy' it didn't seem as there was any sections. However, some parts of the radio documentary didn't really flow well together, an example would be in the middle of the documentary when a music track transitioned into one another, because both music tracks had different beats and were very different it was difficult to transition. To improve that I think I should've used music that were very similar to one another or just used a sting to transition before songs together. If I compared the flow of my radio documentary to one in Radio 4, I don't think it sounds as professional as Radio 4's, this is because when I was listening to the Blondie documentary on Radio 4 the whole documentary had really good flow, there wasn't any point in the documentary where it didn't flow well. Comparing it to mine, the flow wasn't really consistent; in some parts in flowed well and in others it didn't.
Was all the content included relevant and did all of it work well? Discuss this point and give evidence from the finished recording.
What do you feel were your key strengths during the making of this production from blank paper to finished piece, comment on every aspect and say what were your strengths.
What do you feel were your key weaknesses during the making of this production from blank paper to finished piece, comment on every aspect and say what were your weaknesses.
How do you feel you performed during this project?
Looking back on your short production what would you revise or adjust to make the programme